Isuzu Rodeo 2WD

19912004 · 44 configurations

Lowest
15
Average
17
Best
20

The Isuzu Rodeo 2WD has been tested by the EPA across 44 different configurations spanning model years 1991 through 2004. Over this period, the Rodeo 2WD has achieved combined fuel economy ratings ranging from 15 MPG to 20 MPG, with an overall average of 17 MPG across all engine, transmission, and drivetrain combinations. Below you will find a comprehensive breakdown of every tested configuration, organized by model year. Click any row to view detailed specifications, emissions data, and annual fuel cost estimates for that specific vehicle.

All Configurations

Year Powertrain Annual Cost City Hwy Comb MPGCompare
2004
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,300162118MPG
2004
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500162017MPG
2004
3.5L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,300162218MPG
2003
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,300162118MPG
2003
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,150182219MPG
2003
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,500152117MPG
2002
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,500152017MPG
2002
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500151917MPG
2002
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,500162017MPG
2002
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,300172118MPG
2001
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,500162017MPG
2001
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,300172118MPG
2001
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,500152017MPG
2001
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500151917MPG
2000
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,150182119MPG
2000
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,750151916MPG
2000
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151816MPG
1999
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,000182220MPG
1999
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,750151916MPG
1999
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500161917MPG
1998
2.2L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,000182220MPG
1998
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,750151916MPG
1998
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500161917MPG
1997
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,300172018MPG
1997
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$4,000141715MPG
1997
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151716MPG
1996
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,300172018MPG
1996
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$4,000141715MPG
1996
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151716MPG
1995
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,300162018MPG
1995
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,750141816MPG
1995
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151816MPG
1994
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151816MPG
1994
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,750151716MPG
1994
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151716MPG
1993
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500162017MPG
1993
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$3,750151816MPG
1993
3.2L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,750151816MPG
1992
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500162017MPG
1992
3.1L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$4,000141715MPG
1992
3.1L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$4,000141715MPG
1991
2.6L 4-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$3,500162017MPG
1991
3.1L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spdRegular
$4,000141715MPG
1991
3.1L 6-cyl Rear-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spdRegular
$4,000141715MPG

Historical Efficiency

2004
18
2003
19
2002
18
2001
18
2000
19
1999
20
1998
20
1997
18
1996
18
1995
18
1994
16
1993
17
1992
17
1991
17

Safety Rating History

NHTSA typically tests the base platform of a vehicle and does not test every specific trim level. This specific configuration (Rodeo 2WD) has not been independently rated.

Complaint & Incident History

The data below represents all official consumer complaints reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the Isuzu Rodeo 2WD. Click on any year to drill down and read the unedited, raw problem narratives submitted directly by vehicle owners.

Fatal Crash History (FARS)

The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) is a nationwide census providing NHTSA, Congress and the American public yearly data regarding fatal injuries suffered in motor vehicle traffic crashes. The data below represents historical totals for the Isuzu Isuzu Rodeo/ Rodeo Sport grouping as reported by the NHTSA.

Total Fatal Crashes
265
Total Deaths
195

Incident Risk Profile

Rollover Rate
31.3%
Fire Occurrence
2.6%
Speeding Involved
17.4%
DUI Involved
24.9%
Primary Impact Zone

Breakdown of the initial point of impact across all fatal collisions involving this model.

80%
Front
11%
Side
9%
Rear

Year-by-Year Trend & Severity

2023
Fatal Crashes13
Fatalities
11
Deaths/Crash
0.85
2022
Fatal Crashes8
Fatalities
7
Deaths/Crash
0.88
2021
Fatal Crashes20
Fatalities
12
Deaths/Crash
0.60
2020
Fatal Crashes14
Fatalities
11
Deaths/Crash
0.79
2019
Fatal Crashes21
Fatalities
15
Deaths/Crash
0.71
2018
Fatal Crashes23
Fatalities
11
Deaths/Crash
0.48
2017
Fatal Crashes34
Fatalities
34
Deaths/Crash
1.00
2016
Fatal Crashes42
Fatalities
34
Deaths/Crash
0.81
2015
Fatal Crashes42
Fatalities
31
Deaths/Crash
0.74
2014
Fatal Crashes48
Fatalities
29
Deaths/Crash
0.60

Platform Recall Intelligence

Most Recalled Components

Tip: Click any component bar to view detailed recall narratives.

Historical Severity Timeline

2003
2
2002
1
2001
1
2000
2
1999
1
1998
6
1994
3
1993
1
1991
2
Critical
Moderate
Advisory