MPGTerminal

Toyota Matrix

2003–2013 · 41 configurations

Lowest
22
Average
26
Best
29
Jump to:ConfigurationsEfficiencySafetyComplaintsRecalls

The Toyota Matrix has been tested by the EPA across 41 different configurations spanning model years 2003 through 2013. Over this period, the Matrix has achieved combined fuel economy ratings ranging from 22 MPG to 29 MPG, with an overall average of 26 MPG across all engine, transmission, and drivetrain combinations. Below you will find a comprehensive breakdown of every tested configuration, organized by model year. Click any row to view detailed specifications, emissions data, and annual fuel cost estimates for that specific vehicle.

All Configurations

Year Powertrain Annual Cost City Hwy Comb MPGCompare
2013
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2013
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263229MPG
2013
2.4L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,700202622MPG
2013
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2013
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic (S5) • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2012
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2012
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263229MPG
2012
2.4L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,700202622MPG
2012
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2012
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic (S5) • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2011
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2011
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263229MPG
2011
2.4L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,700202622MPG
2011
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2011
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic (S5) • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2010
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,150253128MPG
2010
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,150263228MPG
2010
2.4L 4-cyl All-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,700202622MPG
2010
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2010
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic (S5) • Regular
$2,500212924MPG
2009
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,500212824MPG
2009
2.4L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic (S5) • Regular
$2,500212924MPG
2009
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,150253128MPG
2009
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,150263228MPG
2008
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2008
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263329MPG
2007
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2007
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263329MPG
2006
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2006
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263329MPG
2006
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 6-spd • Premium
$2,750222925MPG
2005
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253127MPG
2005
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,050263329MPG
2005
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 6-spd • Premium
$2,750222925MPG
2004
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253027MPG
2004
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,150253328MPG
2004
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 6-spd • Premium
$2,900222924MPG
2003
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Regular
$2,200253027MPG
2003
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Automatic 4-spd • Premium
$2,750232825MPG
2003
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 5-spd • Regular
$2,150253328MPG
2003
1.8L 4-cyl Front-Wheel Drive
Manual 6-spd • Premium
$2,900222824MPG

Historical Efficiency

2013
29
2012
29
2011
29
2010
28
2009
28
2008
29
2007
29
2006
29
2005
29
2004
28
2003
28

Safety Rating History

NHTSA typically tests the base platform of a vehicle and does not test every specific trim level. This specific configuration (Matrix) has not been independently rated.

Complaint & Incident History

The data below represents all official consumer complaints reported to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) for the Toyota Matrix. Click on any year to drill down and read the unedited, raw problem narratives submitted directly by vehicle owners.

Fatal Crash History (FARS)

The Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) is a nationwide census providing NHTSA, Congress and the American public yearly data regarding fatal injuries suffered in motor vehicle traffic crashes. The data below represents historical totals for the Toyota Toyota Matrix grouping as reported by the NHTSA.

Total Fatal Crashes
393
Total Deaths
257

Incident Risk Profile

Rollover Rate
9.7%
Fire Occurrence
2.5%
Speeding Involved
12.5%
DUI Involved
13.2%
Primary Impact Zone

Breakdown of the initial point of impact across all fatal collisions involving this model.

73%
Front
17%
Side
10%
Rear

Year-by-Year Trend & Severity

2023
Fatal Crashes47
Fatalities
30
Deaths/Crash
0.64
2022
Fatal Crashes44
Fatalities
29
Deaths/Crash
0.66
2021
Fatal Crashes43
Fatalities
35
Deaths/Crash
0.81
2020
Fatal Crashes39
Fatalities
22
Deaths/Crash
0.56
2019
Fatal Crashes44
Fatalities
28
Deaths/Crash
0.64
2018
Fatal Crashes48
Fatalities
30
Deaths/Crash
0.63
2017
Fatal Crashes36
Fatalities
23
Deaths/Crash
0.64
2016
Fatal Crashes32
Fatalities
21
Deaths/Crash
0.66
2015
Fatal Crashes33
Fatalities
24
Deaths/Crash
0.73
2014
Fatal Crashes27
Fatalities
15
Deaths/Crash
0.56
Query NHTSA FARS Database

Platform Recall Intelligence

Most Recalled Components

Tip: Click any component bar to view detailed recall narratives.

Historical Severity Timeline

2011
1
2010
1
2009
10
2008
2
2006
2
2005
2
2003
8
Critical
Moderate
Advisory